The Readiness Signal · Talent acquisition

AI proficiency is becoming a hiring requirement. But what counts as proof?

Before assessing AI proficiency, define what it means in the job. A common knowledge baseline and role-relevant evidence answer different questions.

Original LinkedIn edition published

Cover for AI proficiency is becoming a hiring requirement. But what counts as proof?

These are original companion notes. Read the full newsletter on LinkedIn

The short answer

First define the AI-related task and the evidence a candidate should demonstrate. Core-6 can provide the same foundational knowledge measure across roles; a job-specific interview or exercise, if needed, must be separately designed and evaluated by the employer.

Make the hiring requirement specific

‘AI proficient’ can become a vague hiring filter. A candidate who uses AI frequently may have little experience checking a sensitive output. Another may use it selectively because the role demands confidentiality or professional judgement.

Core-6 offers the same six-area AI knowledge measure to each candidate through Sova. It can add consistent evidence about foundations, data handling, risk, output evaluation and oversight. It does not test a particular job task or score a role-specific work sample.

The hiring team should define the task, the conditions for using AI and the decisions that remain human. If performance in that task matters, a structured interview or relevant exercise can be run separately and reviewed alongside the Core-6 result.

Illustrative example: a sourcing role

The requirement says the person may use an approved AI tool to draft outreach from a role brief. They must verify any claim about pay, location or the employer, exclude sensitive candidate data and personally approve the message. A common knowledge result offers one signal. A separate structured question could ask each candidate to explain what they would check before sending.

Questions to take into your next meeting

  • Describe the actual task instead of asking for generic 'AI proficiency'.
  • State the permitted tools, data boundaries and human decision owner.
  • Use consistent questions and pre-agreed criteria if running a separate exercise.
  • Explain how a Core-6 knowledge result and any other evidence will be used.

Put the idea to work

Try this with one vacancy

Complete the sentence: ‘In this role, a person needs to use AI for [task], within [data and risk boundaries], while checking [evidence] and escalating [decision].’ If the team cannot complete it, refine the requirement before assessing people against it.

Would two candidates face the same clearly defined AI requirement in your process?

Sources and further context